This from my older brother: Yesterday we could not spell third-world country; today we are one.
(I wonder if it’s a joke which has been going around. Regardless, I like it.)
Sphere: Related Content“Forgive, O Lord, my little jokes on Thee, and I'll forgive Thy great big joke on me.” Robert Frost...(There're a lot of jokes...and jokers.)
This from my older brother: Yesterday we could not spell third-world country; today we are one.
(I wonder if it’s a joke which has been going around. Regardless, I like it.)
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Unknown
at
9/21/2011 04:32:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: Congress, Conservatives, Democrats, Entitlements, Family, Ideological Struggle, Oil Dependency, Politics, Republicans
Not really…the suing part.
The local newspaper, The Desert Sun had a piece today indicating disapproval of those protesting Chaz Bono’s upcoming appearance on “Dancing with the Stars.”
I liked it except for the use of “sexual preference.” Now, since I am of the opinion that virtually everyone who is protesting against Mr. Bono’s appearance has participated in his sexual preference activities in one way or another, I doubt very seriously they are protesting that/those preference(s).
So I wrote the following to the “Community Conversations Editor” at the paper. I got carried away.
It was such fun and became so silly that I thought I’d share it. Have fun.
xoxox
Dear Mr. X:
Today your editorial page gave a well-deserved “Thumbs Down” to those who are protesting against Chaz Bono’s appearance on “Dancing with the Stars.”
There would be disagreement only from those who are unwilling to learn.
There is, however, one phrase with which others might quibble; it is “sexual preference.” It might be good to take a few moments to educate your writer about the more accurate “sexual orientation” for use in this type of discussion.
To personalize the point, Sir, might I suggest that your sexual preference is what you prefer to do during sexual incidents. Everyone has sexual preferences which are unique and of no concern to others.
Sexual orientation, on the other hand, is how you “lean” when choosing a partner with whom to participate in mutual sexual preferences.
Absent a declaration from a person, sexual preference is unknowable; sexual orientation is somewhat easier to discern. Since most of the protesters against Mr Bono themselves probably engage in whatever sexual activities they might imagine he participates, they are more than likely protesting his orientation than his preference.
Please discuss this with your writer.
Sincerely,
gene touchet
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Unknown
at
9/10/2011 08:13:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: Conservatives, Culture Wars, Language, Media, Newspapers, Sexuality, Stereotypes, The Desert Sun
Every wonder why God doesn’t punish those people who behave antithetically to the “teachings of the ages?”
For instance, it seems obvious to clear thinkers that the wildfires in Texas are punishment for supporting Rick Perry.
Doesn’t it?
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Unknown
at
9/05/2011 08:19:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: Conservatives, Elections, Ideological Struggle, Politics, Religion, Republicans, Stereotypes
Think taxation without representation was bad?
How are we liking no taxation with representation?
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Unknown
at
3/25/2011 05:52:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: Congress, Conservatives, Mary Bono, Politics, Republicans
Um, the judge who sentenced Tom DeLay to 3 years in prison has “delayed” his incarceration pending appeal.
How many of you think Tom DeLay(ed) will ever serve an hour in prison?
Raise your hands.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Unknown
at
1/11/2011 12:20:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: Congress, Conservatives, Politics, Republicans
Alas, Dear Gentle Reader(s), we’re in a pickle.
Remember all those references to the Constitution by Republican candidates during the last election cycle? Well, now we know why they talked about it so much. They needed lessons.
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX) stood in front of a television set at a fundraiser, when he should’ve been standing in the House of Representatives, and raised his hand when other members of the House, actually in the House at the time, were raising their hands and being sworn in as House members. And there was another newly elected Republican representative at that fundraiser, Mike Fitzpatrick. It was his fundraiser.
A virtual swearing in?
It’s going to be a very strange 2 years with these clowns in office.
By the way, read the entire piece, and discover how Petey acted in violation of the Constitution on the second day of the House calendar.
Trust, but verify. (Might be hard to do.)
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Unknown
at
1/07/2011 06:16:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: Congress, Conservatives, Elections, Republicans, U.S. Constitution
DADT fails by 3 votes.
Not much sympathy for Repuglicans for the next few years.
Now if we could only get rid of Boehner’s bitches.
(Do I sound disgruntled? Very well, then, I sound disgruntled.)
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Unknown
at
12/09/2010 03:10:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: Conservatives, Culture Wars, Politics, Republicans
One has to smile, Dear Gentle Reader(s).
Andrew Sullivan, he of the plummy English voice, wrote this while being slightly critical of MSNBC: “But the bias is pretty overwhelming nonetheless - and sometimes veers into suffocating smugness.”
When on his high horse, the nicest thing which can be said about Sullivan is his smugness.
Love him when he isn’t on a bender about some obscure item (Truly, isn’t Trig’s birth record so last year?!?), and refresh his page several times a day, but the last word he should use in criticizing anyone is any permutation of smug.
Ta.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Unknown
at
10/27/2010 03:44:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: Conservatives, Culture, Language, Pundits
At some point, people should begin discussing the role of pundits and bloviators (not, of course, ersatz pundits and bloviators such as I) in the national discourse.
What, exactly, is or should be the role of such opinionators?
Take Rush Limbaugh's recent statements about his disappointment with Republican conservatives, and about his own determination not to "carry water" for them any longer unless they change their wayward ways.
One has to ask, if Mr. L sometimes felt that he was carrying water for people in whom he had little or no faith, then why did he do it?
Whither self-respect? Whither integrity? Whither intellectual honesty?
What, exactly, is the definition of a panderer? Or a pimp? Or a dealer?
Rush Limbaugh
Pundits
Conservatives
Republicans
Posted by
Unknown
at
11/10/2006 05:28:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: Conservatives, Pundits, Republicans