The right wing nut punditry is having a field day trying to talk the American public into acknowledging a "loss" of the Iraqi conflict.
Take, for instance, Emmett Terrell's piece in townhall.com, "Bust the joint up." It's little bit of puffery for the ovines who read Townhall for solace.
While casting usual aspersions upon Senator Ted Kennedy (what would they do without him?), Terrell writes, "The Democrats' abandonment of this war..."
Um, Em, baby, non, non, mon petit choufleur. No Democratic Party member has ever said this "war" is lost.
The common cant of the right is that the "war" is in Iraq. The Iraqi element of this "war" on terrorists is but a "theater of operations."
Like so many of the United States' wars in the past, this one, too, has had missteps in its beginnings. This particular battle has been a tragic miscalculation from its inception--ersatz cowboys playing cinematic heroes.
The war itself, however, is far from lost, and, in total agreement with President Bush, it is a war which we must win.
We just need someone with the smarts and the leadership to accomplish that victory.
It's time for the right wingers to acknowledge their misplaced trust (after all, it was for a tax cut in the first place--no one ever expected him to wage a war!), and work with knowledgeable people--people who have a wide perspective of the entire situation, societal make-up included--and help America gird the loins for the long struggle.
Emmett Terrell
Townhall.com
Iraqi War
Thursday, December 21, 2006
Wars and Battles Fought Therein
Posted by
Unknown
at
12/21/2006 12:31:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: Democrats, Iraqi War, Pundits, Republicans, War Footing
Sunday, December 03, 2006
Conservation or Prestige--Guess Which Wins
Jeff Melnychuk of Wheelbase Communications has an article in the December 2, 2006, edition of the Riverside, CA, Press-Enterprise, titled "Power Assist." (Sorry, the link is unavailable.)
Melnychuk is writing about the new gas-electric auto models which are not "about green frugality." Here's a wonderful couple of quotes:
"The idea of buying a hybrid for fuel savings...has become obsolete....a new incentive: straight-line performance. And don't forget that performance sells. It always has and most likely always will, not just on the basis of sheer acceleration, but as it's linked to prestige."
Um...prestige. Unh-huh.
Melnychuk then goes on to describe a luxury sedan which, according to a picture caption, has a V-8 hybrid engine with the performance of a V-12. It does have lower emissions, but it doesn't save gas.
What does it take for the auto industry, and the American buying public, for that matter, to remember we are in a struggle against a deadly foe who receives a share of the gasoline costs? Doesn't each gallon of gas somehow go to fund an i.e.d. or a bullet?
Or have I been misinterpreting the President's dire warnings?
Is there not a war on terror? Are we on a war footing here in the U.S.?
Auto CAFE Standards
Fuel Efficiency
War Footing
Posted by
Unknown
at
12/03/2006 08:56:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: Fuel Efficiency, Oil Dependency, War Footing